Wake Forest University Department of Counseling
To save this syllabus, right click and select Print. You may print or save the syllabus as a PDF.
Lead Faculty: Dr. Seth Hayden
Email: haydensc@wfu.edu
Lead Faculty: Dr. Jabari Adams
Email: adamsjab@wfu.edu
This course will provide students with an overview of statistics and research in counseling. It will combine the reading of required texts, journal articles, and other selected publications. In addition, lectures, discussions, small group activities, and student presentations will help students learn and assimilate the key statistics and research principles necessary to successfully complete the Master's in Counseling program, and practice as a professional clinical mental health or school counselor.
Course Content and CACREP Standards:
This content of the course is designed to meet the Council for Accreditation of Counseling and Related Educational Programs (CACREP) standards from Section 3, Foundational Counseling Curriculum (PDF) under subheading G entitled Assessment and Diagnostic Processes and the subheading H entitled Research and Program Evaluation. Students' examination of this subject matter will involve information on research methods, statistical analysis, needs assessment, and program evaluation, including all of the following:
Course materials refer only to the textbook(s), Course Reserves, WFU library readings, or scholarly articles. Refer to the course space for all other instructional content (websites, lectures, videos, interactive activities, etc.)
Erford, B. T. (2024). Research and Evaluation in Counseling (3rd ed.). Cognella.
Aron, A., Coups, E. J., & Aron, E. N. (2011). Statistics for the behavioral and social sciences: A brief course (5th ed.). Prentice Hall. (Select chapters are available through Course Reserves.)
Creswell, J. (2015). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (5th ed.). Pearson. ISBN-13:978- 0133831535 (Select chapters are available through course reserves.)
The following are available as links to articles on the course pages, WFU library readings, or through Course Reserves which is located in the Modules section:
Webcam.
Students will find the day and time in the course:
Live Sessions are not mandatory, but student attendance is encouraged.
Instructional methods in this course include lectures, discussions, case studies, experiential activities related to course content, and other interactive activities.
In clinical courses, instructors interact with students primarily through individual/triadic and group supervision sessions. Instructors also monitor students’ time logs, review required practicum and internship documents, evaluate their counseling session recordings and writeups, and submit midterm and final evaluations related to students’ counseling skills development, as well as their professional dispositions and behaviors development.
This section provides an overview of the items due during this course. See the Course Schedule for additional details.
Discussions serve as the main vehicle for communication between students in the class. Using the forums, information will be shared, concepts will be discussed, and opinions expressed.
These are the assignments that will be completed and submitted throughout the duration of the course.
For this assignment, students will read the introductions to two articles available through Course Reserves. Students will briefly describe in their own words what they think the research problem is for each article. Use no more than 250 words total (1–2 sentences) per article.
For this assignment, students will identify three mental health disorders from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) that interest them. They can choose their topics from the Selected DSM-5 handout, or directly from the DSM-5.
For this assignment, students will choose their favorite of three possible topics for their literature review then search for a journal article from the Z. Smith Reynolds Library that pertains to their topic. Students will complete the Finding a Journal Article worksheet.
For this assignment, students will provide a response to a case student of Richard by briefly outlining strategies for collecting data (for example, interviews, observations, standardized or counselor-made tests) and scales (that is, nominal, ordinal, interval, ratio) that would be related to the variables of this study.
For this assignment, students will conduct a literature search using various relevant databases. Resources will be selected from 2011 to present. This will involve reviewing the abstracts from at least 25 citations; however, only choosing 15–20 citations for the submitted reference list. The citations should include book chapters, review articles, and original research articles from peer-reviewed, professional journals from the fields of counseling, psychology, social work, psychiatry, or similar professional disciplines.
For this assignment, students will respond to questions regarding central tendency and variance.
For this assignment, students will respond to questions related to inferential statistics.
For this assignment, students will create a presentation in which they outline the benefits of experimental research within the context of a case scenario.
For this assignment, students will respond to a case study in which they evaluate a scenario indicating the ethical dimensions of the case and providing appropriate ethical strategies for conducting research.
For this assignment, students will evaluate a scenario related to program evaluation. Students will identify salient characteristics of evaluating the program and provide effective strategies for evaluation.
For this assignment, students will utilize skills in the critical analysis of counseling-related information and synthesizing this information in a clear and concise manner by creating a literature review on a specific diagnosis in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders.
For this assignment, students will critically examine the methods, results, discussion, and implications sections of an article available through Course Reserves.
For this assignment, students will consider the trustworthiness of the article analyzed in assignment 6.1.
For this assignment, students will choose to read and learn about one of the qualitative research designs discussed in Chapter 6 of the Erford text (that is, ethnographic, case study, phenomenological, grounded theory, or consensual qualitative research designs) and create a Voicethread presentation that will outline the primary points related to the selected design.
For this assignment students will make a visual aid (i.e., poster) depicting the findings of the literature review. The purpose of creating the poster is for students to synthesize the critical information from their literature review into a clear and concise presentation of their findings. This activity along with the research symposium are designed to replicate a poster presentation session at a professional conference, which may be an option for students to consider at some point in the future. More information on the activity and its implications will be provided at residency one.
For this assignment, students will critically examine the construction of a single-subject research study around whether adolescent-age individuals diagnosed with depression experience a decrease in symptoms when provided person-centered therapy
There are two signature assignments for this course, the Literature Review and the Program Evaluation Case Study, that are to be submitted in Anthology Portfolio, an e-portfolio, data storage, and data management program. Both assignments will be used for course grade calculations (using the grading rubric), program evaluation reporting, and student learning outcomes (SLO) / key performance indicator (KPI) monitoring. For program evaluation reporting and SLO/KPI monitoring, we use a CACREP rubric that measures student learning on a scale from 1 (harmful) to 5 (exceeds expectations). The student learning outcomes on which you will be evaluated for the Literature Review are 1.) 2.H.1., the importance of research in advancing the counseling profession, including the use of research to inform counseling practice, and 2.) 2.H.2., identification and evaluation of the evidence base for counseling theories, interventions, and practices. For the Program Evaluation Case Study, the following student learning will be 2.H.8., program evaluation designs and procedures, including needs assessments, formative assessments, and summative assessments to inform decision-making and advocacy.
Based on the 2024 CACREP standards (2.E.1.a., 2.C.1.a.), our counseling program is required to report aggregated SLO/KPI ratings, as well as monitor individual student SLO/KPI progress. The expectation is that students, on average and individually, will receive average CACREP rubric ratings of 4 (meets expectations) on each SLO/KPI measure. Student ratings on SLO/KPI measures that fall below a 3 (near expectations) may result in remediation. These rubrics can be found in the appendices of this syllabus.
The student learning outcomes map can be found on page 9 of the program evaluation report (PDF).
Students are encouraged to make the same effort to submit all assignments on time that they would use in the workplace. It is, however, understood that sometimes circumstances arise that are beyond our control. To request an extension, students should contact their Lead Faculty as soon as a problem is identified to provide details and determine a realistic deadline. Assignments submitted late without prior approval will not be eligible for full credit.
Unless arrangements have been made, students who submit late assignments will receive a 10% grade deduction for each day beyond the due date.
This table details the grade points and/or percentages of each assignment.
Assessment | Points Possible | Percentage |
---|---|---|
Discussions | 30 | 5% |
Assignments | 450 | 75% |
Quizzes | 44 | 7% |
Final Exam | 80 | 13% |
Total | 604 | 100% |
This table lists the letter grade corresponding to ranges of points.
Final grading is at the discretion of the faculty.
Letter Grade | Percentage |
---|---|
A | 93–100 |
A− | 90–92 |
B+ | 87–89 |
B | 83–86 |
B− | 80–82 |
C+ | 77–79 |
C | 70–76 |
F | 0–69 |
Every student is required to practice and adhere to the principle of academic integrity while undertaking studies with Wake Forest University. Maintaining academic integrity is considered an essential academic standard of every graduate course and program. The University does not tolerate academic dishonesty.
The graduate faculty at Wake Forest has adopted a formal honor code to provide guidance for student conduct with respect to academic pursuits. Read the Graduate Student Academic Honor Code (PDF).
Academic dishonesty may be an academic issue or a disciplinary issue, or both, depending on its pervasiveness and/or severity. Any student engaged in academic dishonesty may face reprimand, disciplinary warning, a lowered or failing grade(s), and/or probation or suspension from the course, academic program, or University; or expulsion from the University.
The list that follows includes examples, although not all-inclusive, of academic dishonesty:
For the complete academic honesty policy and tips to avoid plagiarism, as well as further information on all academic policies, including the policies for adding and dropping a course, requesting a grade of incomplete, academic probation, termination of enrollment, reinstatement, and student and faculty expectations, see the Wake Forest University Student Handbook.
In accordance with Wake Forest University's policy regarding class recordings, be mindful of this information:
It is very important that students actively engage in class discussions, and that students communicate in a timely manner with their instructors if unforeseen circumstances negatively affect their academic engagement. WFU monitors student academic engagement through student activity in the course, much of which can be monitored automatically in Canvas (e.g., logging into the course in Canvas, participating in discussion boards, submitting assignments, reviewing learning materials in the modules); attending live sessions, office hours, and individual/triadic/group supervision sessions; and communicating by phone or email with instructors. If an entire week passes without a student submission of an assignment and/or no contact is made with instructors, the following will occur:
Identify the minimum device configuration requirements for this institution.
Assistance to resolve technical problems is available 24/7, 365 days a year.
Students can access the Help Desk at: Wake Forest Help Desk.
Help Desk services are restricted primarily to problems associated with the functionality of the course delivery platform. Responsibilities include:
Sometimes students may not be sure whether a problem they are having is caused by their computer system or the online learning management system. The Help Desk will help students figure out where the problem lies and attempt to resolve issues immediately. However, some highly advanced hardware issues may require additional assistance. If this is the case, the Help Desk may suggest seeking assistance from a local computer repair establishment.
Call a Canvas Expert: 833.383.5792
For Canvas technical support, select the Help icon in the navigation bar, where students will find several options including:
When submitting a ticket, be as specific as possible in the description of the issue. Include the name of the course and the date the issue occurred, the browser being used and, if possible, screenshots to help Canvas support personnel troubleshoot the issue and expedite service.
Note: Lead Faculty and PIs do not provide Canvas support.
AskDeac services include most technology issues outside of the scope of course delivery. Common requests include assistance setting up a VPN, setting up a WFU Zoom account, using Google Drive, and resetting WFU email passwords.
Assistance to resolve technical issues is available through Email or Live Chat from 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. EST, Monday through Friday. Phone support is available from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. EST, Monday through Friday.
Access AskDeac at: AskDeac.
Wake Forest University is committed to supporting diversity, equity, and inclusion. The Office of Diversity and Inclusion provides campus resources such as the Intercultural Center, LGBTQ Center, Women’s Center, and more. Locate these on the webpage under Affinity & Support.
To learn more about WFU’s commitment to diversity, equity, inclusion read the Non-Discrimination Statement and policy on Non-Discrimination on the Basis of Disability.
Pro Humanitate - As a part of the Wake Forest community, the faculty and staff of the Department of Counseling fully embrace the concept of Pro Humanitate. In each of our classes (graduate, undergraduate, face-to-face, and virtual), we strive to affirm every person and every identity including but not limited to gender identity, affectional orientation, language, national origin, color, race, disability, sex, religion, creed, and ancestry. We embrace the development of critical thinkers that consistently aspire to become culturally responsive and encourage you to challenge your own biases while developing the necessary skills to enter your chosen profession. Further, the faculty and staff will promote the Realizing Inclusion, Diversity, and Equity (R.I.D.E.) framework in our teaching, research, supervision and advising. We hope that you will join us along this journey, with a commitment to advocacy and social justice in both your personal and professional lives. Pro Humanitate, to better the lives of all humans!
Wake Forest strives to provide equal access for all learners. Learning content contained within the Canvas Learning Management System is designed to meet the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1 AA developed by the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) and Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act. Throughout our course development process, we test the capabilities of our learning content against these standards.
Wake Forest University recognizes its responsibility for creating an institutional climate in which students with differing needs and abilities can thrive.
Along with the mission of the Division of Student Life, Disability Services exists to enable students with disabilities to experience equal access to the academic, social, and recreational activities and programs at Wake Forest University. To achieve this goal, the Center for Learning, Access, and Student Success (CLASS) is available to offer academic support for all Wake Forest Students. CLASS staff works with students, faculty, and staff to implement services and accommodations that are in accordance with both state and federal laws and our own commitment to this goal.
If a student has a disability that may require an accommodation for taking this course, use the Student Portal Login located on the Center for Learning, Access, and Student Success (CLASS) website. Alternatively, contact the Center for Learning, Access, and Student Success at the contact information provided.
Contact Information:
118 Reynolda Hall, WFU
Winston-Salem, NC, 27109
Phone: 336-758-5929
Email: class@wfu.edu
Disaster Planning/Catastrophic Event Policy: In the event the University calendar is disrupted by disaster or catastrophic event, please continue with the assigned lessons and adhere to the due dates of assignments and discussions. The instructor will be available by email or by phone, unless the internet or phone is inaccessible.
This section details the activities for each day of the week.
The course week runs from Monday (Day 1) to Sunday (Day 7). Due dates for assignments and discussions are stated in day numbers. Unless otherwise noted, all assessments are due by 11:59 p.m. E.T. on the designated day.
There will be Live Sessions and Office Hours each week unless otherwise communicated. Students will find the day and time in the course:
Please Note: Readings refer to course materials, which are only the textbook(s), Course Reserves, WFU library readings, or scholarly articles. Refer to the course space for all other instructional content (websites, lectures, videos, interactive activities, etc.)
Lesson | Readings | Discussions | Assignments | Quizzes/Exams |
---|---|---|---|---|
Lesson 1: The Nature of Research and Inquiry Course Objectives: Students will explore hallmarks of scientific inquiry and differentiate between quantitative and qualitative research. CACREP Standard(s): 3.H.1, 3.H.3 |
Erford text:
Chapter 1, The Nature of Research and Inquiry |
Discussion 1.1: Introductory Discussion (Due Day 4) | None | None |
Lesson 2: Characteristics of a Research Study Course Objectives: Students will outline the characteristics of a research study and examine research problems and their function within a research study. CACREP Standard(s): 3.H.1, 3.H.7 |
Erford text:
Chapter 4: The Research Process |
None | Assignment 1.1: Research Problems (Due Day 7) | None |
Lesson 3: Reviewing the Literature Course Objectives: Students will examine the five steps to conducting a literature review. CACREP Standard(s): 3.H.1, 3.H.2, 3.H.7, 3.H.10, 3.H.11 |
Erford text:
Chapter 3, Locating, Reviewing, and Writing Research |
None | Assignment 1.2: Research Project Ideas (Due Day 7) Assignment 1.3: Finding a Journal Article (Due Day 7) |
None |
Lesson | Readings | Discussions | Assignments | Quizzes/Exams |
---|---|---|---|---|
Lesson 1: Outcome Research in Counseling Course Objectives: Students will construct quantitative research questions and hypotheses and qualitative research questions. CACREP Standard(s): 3.H.3, 3.H.11 |
Erford text:
|
Discussion 2.1: Writing a Research Question and Hypotheses (Initial Post Due Day 4, Reply Posts Due Day 7) | None | None |
Lesson 2: Quantitative Data and Descriptive Statistics Course Objectives: Students will differentiate scales of measurement, identify different forms of questions for collecting data, analyze methods of collecting data, and interpret measures of central tendency. CACREP Standard(s): 3.G.3, 3.H.3, 3.H.11 |
Erford text:
Chapter 6: Collecting Quantitative Data Aron, A., Coups, E. J., & Aron, E. N. text, available through Course Reserves.Chapter 2, pp. 30–35 |
None | Assignment 2.1: Designing Quantitative Research - Case Study (Due Day 7) Assignment 2.2: Reference List (Due Day 7) |
Quiz 2.1: Descriptive Statistics 1 (Due Day 7) |
Lesson | Readings | Discussions | Assignments | Quizzes/Exams |
---|---|---|---|---|
Lesson 1: Descriptive Statistics: The Normal Curve and Dispersion Course Objectives: Students will calculate the following measurements of dispersions: range, variance, and standard deviation. CACREP Standard(s): 3.G.3, 3.H.3, 3.H.6, 3.H.7, 3.H.11 |
Erford text:
Chapter 7: Analyzing and Interpreting Quantitative Data Aron, A., Coups, E. J., & Aron, E. N. text, available through Course Reserves.Chapter 2, pp. 36–43 |
None | None | None |
Lesson 2: Descriptive Statistics: The Normal Curve and Standard Scores Course Objectives: Students will evaluate the characteristics of the normal curve, calculate standard deviation units, percentages, standard scores, and percentiles based on the normal curve, and calculate standard scores from raw data. CACREP Standard(s): 3.G.3, 3.H.3, 3.H.6, 3.H.7, 3.H.11 |
Aron, A., Coups, E. J., & Aron, E. N. text, available through Course Reserves.
Chapter 2, pp. 43–49 |
None | Assignment 3.1: Descriptive Statistics Exercises (Due Day 7) | None |
Lesson 3: Correlation and Reliability Course Objectives: Students will examine the function of Pearson r correlation, examine the function of coefficients of determination, and distinguish the differences between types of reliability. CACREP Standard(s): 3.G.3, 3.G.4, 3.H.3, 3.H.6, 3.H.7, 3.H.11 |
Erford text:
Chapter 11, Correlational Research Designs |
None | None | Quiz 3.1: Descriptive Statistics 2 (Due Day 7) |
Supplemental Lesson A: Inferential Statistics Course Objectives: Students will examine the characteristics of inferential statistics including hypothesis testing. CACREP Standard(s): 3.G.3, 3.H.2, 3.H.3, 3.H.5, 3.H.6, 3.H.7, 3.H.10, 3.H.11 |
Erford text:
|
None | None | Supplemental Quiz 1: Inferential Statistics Problems, Part 1 (Due Day 7) |
Supplemental Lesson B: Inferential Statistics—Testing for Statistical Significance Course Objectives: Students will examine the characteristics of inferential statistics including hypothesis testing and comparative analysis. CACREP Standard(s): 3.G.3, 3.H.2, 3.H.3, 3.H.5, 3.H.6, 3.H.7, 3.H.10, 3.H.11 |
Aron, Coups, & Aron text, available through Course Reserves.
|
None | Supplemental Assignment: Inferential Statistics Problems, Part 2 (Due Day 7) | None |
Lesson | Readings | Discussions | Assignments | Quizzes/Exams |
---|---|---|---|---|
Lesson 1: Experimental Research Designs Course Objectives: Students will examine aspects of experimental research, contrast experimental research from other research designs, and analyze potential ethical considerations related to an experimental design. CACREP Standard(s): 3.H.2, 3.H.3, 3.H.5, 3.H.6, 3.H.10 |
Erford text:
|
None | Assignment 4.1: Benefits of Experimental Research (Due Day 7) | None |
Lesson 2: Correlational Research Course Objectives: Students will examine aspects of correlational research, contrast correlational research from other research designs, and differentiate methods of correlational research. CACREP Standard(s): 3.G.3, 3.H.3, 3.H.7 |
Erford text:
|
Discussion 4.1: Literature Review Workshop (Initial Post Due Day 4, Reply Posts Due Day 7) | None | None |
Lesson | Readings | Discussions | Assignments | Quizzes/Exams |
---|---|---|---|---|
Lesson 1: Action Research Course Objectives: Students will examine aspects of action research, and distinguish action research from other research designs. CACREP Standard(s): 3.H.1, 3.H.2, 3.H.3, 3.H.4, 3.H.6, 3.H.7, 3.H.9, 3.H.11 |
Erford text:
Mason, E. C. M., Land, C., Brodie, I., Collins, K., Pennington, C., Sands, K., & Sierra, M. (2017). Data and research that matter: Mentoring school counselors to publish action research. Professional School Counseling, 20(1), 184–193. Rowell, L. L. (2006). Action research and school counseling: Closing the gap between research and practice. Professional School Counseling, 376–384. |
None | None | Practice Quiz 5.1: Characteristics of Action Research (Due Day 7) |
Lesson 2: Program Evaluation and Needs Assessment Course Objectives: Students will examine the characteristics and structure of program evaluation and needs assessment in counseling. CACREP Standard(s): 3.H.1, 3.H.2, 3.H.3, 3.H.4, 3.H.5, 3.H.6, 3.H.7, 3.H.8, 3.H.9, 3.H.10, 3.H.11 |
Erford text:
Astramovich, R. L., & Coker, K. (2007). Program evaluation: The accountability bridge model for counselors. Journal of Counseling and Development, 85(2), 162–172. |
None | Assignment 5.1: Conducting Ethical Research (Due Day 7) Assignment 5.2: Program Evaluation Case Study (Due Day 7) Assignment 5.3: Literature Review (Due Day 7) |
None |
Lesson | Readings | Discussions | Assignments | Quizzes/Exams |
---|---|---|---|---|
Lesson 1: Collecting Qualitative Data Course Objectives: Students will analyze aspects of qualitative research design, and outline procedures for collecting qualitative data. CACREP Standard(s): 3.H.3 |
Erford text:
Duffey, T., Haberstroh, S., & Trepal, H. (2009). A grounded theory of relational competencies and creativity in counseling: Beginning the dialogue. Journal of Creativity in Mental Health, 4, 89–112. |
None | Assignment 6.1: Qualitative Research Case Study, Part 1 (Due Day 7) | None |
Lesson 2: Analyzing and Interpreting Qualitative Data Course Objectives: Students will examine methods for analyzing and interpreting qualitative data CACREP Standard(s): 3.H.3, 3.H.6 |
Creswell text, available through Course Reserves:
|
None | Assignment 6.2: Qualitative Research Case Study, Part 2 (Due Day 7) | None |
Lesson 3: Qualitative Research Designs Course Objectives: Students will examine characteristics of specific qualitative research designs CACREP Standard(s): 3.H.2, 3.H.3, 3.H.6 |
Erford text:
Chapter 14: Experience-Related Qualitative Research Designs |
None | Assignment 6.3: Chapter Presentations (Due Day 7) Assignment 6.4: Literature Review Visual Aid (Due Day 7) |
None |
Lesson | Readings | Discussions | Assignments | Quizzes/Exams |
---|---|---|---|---|
Lesson 1: Single-Subject Research Design Course Objectives: Students will design a single-subject research study. CACREP Standard(s): 3.H.1, 3.H.2, 3.H.3, 3.H.4, 3.H.5, 3.H.6, 3.H.7, 3.H.9, 3.H.10, 3.H.11 |
Erford text:
Chapter 13: Single-Subject Research Designs |
None | Assignment 7.1: Single-Subject Research Study (Due Day 7) | Test 7.1: Final Exam (Due Day 7) |
For a list of image credits for this course, visit the CNS721 Credits Page.