ADDIE Paper Rubric

ADDIE Paper Rubric – 100 Points
Criteria	Exemplary Exceeds Expectations	Advanced Meets Expectations	Intermediate Needs Improvement	Novice Inadequate	Total Points
Introduction	Contains a brief statement that focuses on the purpose of the paper and the sections, with a clear and concise introduction. Minimum ½ page 5 points	Contains a brief statement of the purpose of the paper and the sections. 4 points	Contains a brief statement of the purpose of the paper or the sections. 3 points	No introduction is provided. 2 points	5
Assess	Discusses the issue/problem in detail. Identify the problem through the PICO format outlining and providing details of the components of PICO (2–5 pages) supported by the literature minimum of 2 addition sources however may use text as third resource. Provide an overview of the proposed project (Concepts from the following weekly assignments are to be addressed in the paper/ PowerPoint; Week 1 discussion 2; Week 2 discussion 1; Week 6 discussion 1) 2–5 pages 10 points	Missing 1 concepts per guideline Less than 2 pages 8 points	Does not clarify what issue/problem There is an incomplete or inaccurate background/overview of the identified issue/problem given. Missing 2 or more concepts per guideline Less than 2 pages 7 points	Minimally address the problem background and concepts per guidelines Less than 1 page 6 points	10
Design	Research the best practices based on a literature review for evidence-based practices for the proposed project (Concepts from the following weekly assignments are to be addressed in the paper/ PowerPoint; Week 2 discussion 2; Week 4 discussion 1) include SWOT analysis diagram Incorporates into a meaningful discussion of the identified issue/problem. Incorporates at least 6 references from peer-reviewed journals. Minimum 2 pages 35 points	Incorporates into a meaningful discussion of the identified issue/problem. Incorporates at least 5 references from peer-reviewed Less than 2 pages 31 points	Incorporates into a meaningful discussion of the identified issue/problem. Incorporates at least 4 references from peer-reviewed Less than 2 pages 27 points	Incorporates into a meaningful discussion of the identified issue/problem. Incorporates 3 or less references from peer-reviewed Less than 1 page 24 points	35
Develop	Specifically plan for addressing the identified problem in the work environment to include the root cause analysis, Project management key elements impacting the plan. Minimum 3 pages (Concepts from the following weekly assignments are to be addressed in the paper/ PowerPoint; Week 3 discussion 1; Week 5 discussion 1; Week 6 discussion 2) Minimum 3 pages 10 points	Less than 3 pages Missing 1 concept/component 8 points	Less than 3 pages Missing 2 concept/ component 7 points	Less than 2 pages Missing > 2 concept/ components 6 points	10
Implementation	Create a step-by-step process for implementing your developed plan. In the Implementation stage include the workflow diagram (Concepts from the following weekly assignments are to be addressed in the paper/ PowerPoint; Week 3 discussion 2) Provides a clear and effective visual representation of the Develop plan as a Workflow Diagram Minimum 2 pages 15 points	Provides a visual representation of the Develop plan. Less than 2 pages Missing 1 concept/component 13 points	Visual representation of the Develop plan is unclear, confusing, or incomplete. Less than 2 pages Missing 2 concepts/components 11 points	Implementation section is less than the required 1 page. Missing > 2 concepts/components 10 points	15
Evaluate	Provides an in-depth reflective summary including theoretical discussion about the lessons learned Addresses measures and outcomes of the project Supported by the literature Minimum 2 pages 10 points	Incomplete reflective summary or underdeveloped theoretical discussion about the lessons learned Addresses measures and outcomes of the project Supported by the literature Less than 2 pages 8 points	Missing details on reporting measures and outcomes, summary or literature support Less than 2 pages 7 points	Does not address or summarize lessons learned Less than 2 pages 6 points	10
Conclusion	A concise and accurate summary of the information provided. Does not introduce new concepts in this section. Minimum ½ page 5 points	A brief recap of the information provided. Does not introduce new concepts in this section. Less than 3 sentences 4 points	Conclusion does not summarize the information accurately. Introduces new concepts in this section. Less than 3 sentences 3 points	Conclusion section is absent Less than 3 sentences 2 points	5
Format	The paper is correctly formatted in APA style. This includes margins, spacing, pagination, headings, headers, citations, references, according to the specified citation manual. Paper is no longer than 15 pages, not including the title and reference pages 5 points	The paper mostly conforms to APA style with 1–3 errors. This includes margins, spacing, pagination, headings, headers, citations, references, according to the specified citation manual. Paper is longer than 15 pages, not including the title and reference pages. 4 points	The paper minimally conforms to APA style with 4–6 errors and/or is longer than the allowed maximum of 15 pages. 3 points	The paper contains more than 7 APA errors and/or is considerably longer than the allowed maximum of 15 pages or the paper is less than the 12 page minimum 2 points	5
Clarity & Style (Spelling, Grammar, & Punctuation)	The writer correctly identifies the reading audience, as demonstrated by appropriate language (avoids jargon and simplifies complex concepts appropriately). Writing is concise, in active voice, and avoids awkward transitions, and the overuse of conjunctions. There are no spelling, punctuation, or word-usage errors. 5 points	The writer demonstrates the correct usage of formal English language in sentence construction. Variation in sentence structure and word usage promotes readability. There are minimal to no grammar, punctuation, or word-usage errors. 4 points	The writer occasionally uses awkward sentence construction or overuses/inappropriately uses complex sentence structure. Problems with word usage (evidence of the incorrect use of a thesaurus) and punctuation persist, often causing some difficulties with grammar. Some words, transitional phrases, and conjunctions are overused. Multiple grammar, punctuation, or word usage errors. 3 points	The writer demonstrates a limited understanding of formal written language use; writing is colloquial (conforms to spoken language). Grammar and punctuation are consistently incorrect. Spelling errors are numerous. Submits assignment late. 2 points	5
Total Points					100