Current Regis Time
| Criteria | Exemplary Exceeds Expectations |
Advanced Meets Expectations |
Intermediate Needs Improvement |
Novice Inadequate |
Total Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Psychiatric Assessment | Takes a comprehensive approach for assessing case study with higher-level thinking.
20 points |
Addresses categories with adequate responses.
17 points |
Makes an attempt to assess case study client but shows minimal ability to analyze situation.
15 points |
Unable to address assessment category in an understandable manner.
13 points |
20 |
| Diagnosis (Primary and Differential) | Demonstrates evidence of critical thinking at an advanced practice level.
20 points |
Demonstrates some use of critical thinking at the advanced practice level.
17 points |
Limited demonstration of critical thinking at the advanced practice level.
15 points |
Shows no higher-level thinking.
13 points |
20 |
| Biopsychosocial Case Formulation | Presents information in a systematic manner and uses logical format with clear objectives and planning.
20 points |
Presents information in a reasonable manner that implies some higher-level understanding.
17 points |
Presents information without full clarity of the clinical situation.
15 points |
Unable to articulate understanding of the clinical subject matter.
13 points |
20 |
| Treatment Plan, Implementation, Coordination, Health Teaching & Promotion | High level of conceptual understanding of the advanced practice role in planning sound treatment, utilizing management techniques, client teaching, and health promotion approaches.
20 points |
Demonstrates adequate understanding of the clinical situation, sound teaching, and health promotion approaches.
17 points |
Demonstrates minimal understanding of the clinical management system, teaching, and health promotion activities.
15 points |
Unable to implement or understand implementation and coordination of care, teaching, or health promotion activities.
13 points |
20 |
| Outcomes and Evidence-based Resources | Demonstrates comprehensive use of evidence to support metrics and practice tools. Uses more than three research-based references.
10 points |
Demonstrates appropriate use of evidence to support practice/outcome measures. Uses a minimum of three research-based references.
8 points |
Minimal use of evidence and limited understanding of outcome measures. Relies only on classroom textbooks as references.
7 points |
No demonstration of evidence-based practice. Does not support practice decisions with references.
6 points |
10 |
| Grammar/Spelling | Author makes no significant errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content
5 points |
Author makes no significant errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content
4 points |
Author makes minor errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content
3 points |
Author makes several errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content
2 points |
5 |
| APA Format | Follows APA 100% of the time
5 points |
Follows APA 90-99% of the time
4 points |
Follows APA 80-89% of the time
3 points |
Follows APA less than 80% of the time
2 points |
5 |
| Total points | 100 | ||||