Criteria | Exemplary Exceeds Expectations |
Advanced Meets Expectations |
Intermediate Needs Improvement |
Novice Inadequate |
Total Points |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Subjective – 40% | Determined by iHuman 40 points |
Determined by iHuman 36 points |
Determined by iHuman 32 points |
Determined by iHuman 0 points |
40 |
Objective – 25% | Determined by iHuman 25 points |
Determined by iHuman 22 points |
Determined by iHuman 20 points |
Determined by iHuman 0 points |
25 |
Objective – 5% (Testing) | Determined by iHuman 5 points |
Determined by iHuman 4 points |
Determined by iHuman 3 points |
Determined by iHuman 0 points |
5 |
Assessment–5% | Three differential diagnoses are supported by findings and include worst-case scenario. Rationale for differential diagnoses provided by scholarly resources. 5 points |
Three differential diagnoses include worst-case scenario, but one diagnosis might not be fully supported by findings. Rationale for differential diagnoses provided by scholarly resources. 3 points |
Differential diagnoses may or may not include worst-case scenario, and two differential diagnoses are not supported by findings. Rationale for all differential diagnoses not provided by scholarly resources. 1 points |
Fewer than three differential diagnoses identified, or differential diagnoses not supported by findings and do not include worst-case scenario. Scholarly resources not provided or do not support differential diagnoses. 0 points |
5 |
Plan–25% | Comprehensive plan includes all components:
25 points |
Plan missing one of the identified components:
17 points |
Plan missing two of the identified components:
9 points |
Plan missing more than three of the identified components:
0 points |
25 |
Total Points | 100 |