Current Regis Time

Comprehensive Case Study Rubric

Comprehensive Case Study Rubric – 100 Points
Criteria Exemplary
Exceeds Expectations
Advanced
Meets Expectations
Intermediate
Needs Improvement
Novice
Inadequate
Total Points
Approach to Patient Care Approach to patient care is organized, logical, patient-centered, and cost effective, with 0 errors.

10 points
Approach to patient care is organized, logical, patient-centered, and cost effective, with 1–3 minor errors or 1 major error.

7 points
Approach to patient care is organized, logical, patient-centered, and cost effective, with 4–6 minor errors or 2 major errors.

5 points
Approach to patient care is organized, logical, patient-centered, and cost effective, with 6+ minor errors or 2+ major errors.

3 points
10
Differential Diagnoses (Including Problems) All required differential diagnoses and problems are included (including worst case) and fully supported by findings.

Rationale for all differential diagnoses provided.

20 points
Most required differential diagnoses and/or problems are included (including worst case); one is not supported by findings.

Rationale for most differential diagnoses provided.

18 points
Some required differential diagnoses or problems are included (not including worst case); two are not fully supported by findings.

Rationale for some differential diagnoses provided.

14 points
Few required differential diagnoses or problems are included; more than two are not fully supported by findings.

Rationale provided for few differential diagnoses.

9 points
20
Case Specific questions and Rationale Logical and systematic organization of data.

Rationale provided for all answers and decisions made regarding patient care. Rationale is based on current evidence, with 0 errors.

Correct terminology, spelling, and grammar.

20 points
Logical and systematic organization of data.

Rationale provided for most answers and decisions made regarding patient care. Rationale is based on current evidence, with 1–3 minor errors or 1 major error.

Terminology, spelling or grammar errors (1–3).

15 points
Minor errors in organization of data.

Rationale provided for some answers and decisions made regarding patient care. Rationale is based on current evidence, with 4–6 minor errors or 2 major errors.

Terminology, spelling, or grammar errors (4–6).

11 points
Disorganized flow of data.

Rationale provided for few answers and decisions made regarding patient care. Rationale is based on current evidence, with 6+ minor errors or 2+ major errors.

Terminology, spelling, or grammar errors (>6).

6 points
20
Plan Comprehensive plan includes all components with no errors:
  • Diagnostic testing
  • Pharmacologic intervention
  • Nonpharmacologic intervention Referrals
  • Follow-up

50 points
Plan missing 1 of the identified components or plan is based on current evidence, with 1–3 minor errors or 1 major error.:
  • Diagnostic testing
  • Pharmacologic intervention
  • Nonpharmacologic intervention Referrals
  • Follow-up

40 points
Plan missing 2 of the identified components or plan is based on current evidence, with 4–6 minor errors or 2 major errors.:
  • Diagnostic testing
  • Pharmacologic intervention
  • Nonpharmacologic intervention Referrals
  • Follow-up

30 points
Plan missing >3 of the identified components and/or has safety Concerns or is based on current evidence, with 6+ minor errors or 2+ major errors.:
  • Diagnostic testing
  • Pharmacologic intervention
  • Nonpharmacologic intervention Referrals
  • Follow-up

20 points
50
Total Points 100