Current Regis Time
| Rubric Criteria | Exemplary Exceeds Expectations |
Advanced Meets Expectations |
Intermediate Needs Improvement |
Novice Inadequate |
Total Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Quality | Presents a useful clinical reference. Content is comprehensive and easily understood. 25 points |
Addresses assigned questions but utility as clinical reference is not ideal. 22 points |
Content is either overly simplified. 19 points |
Content is off topic and incomplete. 17 points |
25 |
| Critical Thinking | Presentation reflects thoughtfulness, insight, and analysis. Synthesizes recommendations. 25 points |
Thought, insight, and analysis has taken place. 22 points |
Restates summary of disorder. 19 points |
Presentation is rudimentary and superficial. 17 points |
25 |
| Safety | Relevant safety concerns are fully addressed and explained. 25 points |
Relevant safety concerns lack clarity or are generalized. 22 points |
Safety concerns are incomplete. 19 points |
Safety concerns are not addressed. 17 points |
25 |
| Communication | Ideas are arranged logically. Language clearly and effectively communicates ideas. Errors are minimal. Citations are present. Content is formatte so as to be useful for clinical practice. 25 points |
Ideas are arranged logically. In general, language does not interfere with communication. Errors are not distracting or frequent, although may be present. Citations are present. 22 points |
Transition between ideas is occasionally rough. Work is organized but communication is distracting due to typos, misspellings and other errors. Citations are present. 19 points |
Work is unfocused and poorly organized. In many places language obscures meaning. Lacks logical connection of ideas. Little evidence of proofreading. Citations are omitted. 17 points |
25 |
| Total points | 100 | ||||