Rubric Criteria |
25 points |
18 points |
10 point |
0 points |
Total Points |
Overall Quality |
Presents a useful clinical reference. Content is comprehensive and easily understood. |
Addresses assigned questions but utility as clinical reference is not ideal. |
Content is either overly simplified. |
Content is off topic and incomplete. |
25 |
Critical Thinking |
Presentation reflects thoughtfulness, insight, and analysis. Synthesizes recommendations. |
Thought, insight, and analysis has taken place. |
Restates summary of disorder. |
Presentation is rudimentary and superficial. |
25 |
Safety |
Relevant safety concerns are fully addressed and explained. |
Relevant safety concerns lack clarity or are generalized. |
Safety concerns are incomplete. |
Safety concerns are not addressed. |
25 |
Communication |
Ideas are arranged logically. Language clearly and effectively communicates ideas. Errors are minimal. Citations are present. Content is formatte so as to be useful for clinical practice. |
Ideas are arranged logically. In general, language does not interfere with communication. Errors are not distracting or frequent, although may be present. Citations are present. |
Transition between ideas is occasionally rough. Work is organized but communication is distracting due to typos, misspellings and other errors. Citations are present. |
Work is unfocused and poorly organized. In many places language obscures meaning. Lacks logical connection of ideas. Little evidence of proofreading. Citations are omitted. |
25 |
Total points |
100 |