| Rubric Criteria | 25 points | 18 points | 10 point | 0 points | Total Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Quality | Presents a useful clinical reference. Content is comprehensive and easily understood. | Addresses assigned questions but utility as clinical reference is not ideal. | Content is either overly simplified. | Content is off topic and incomplete. | 25 |
| Critical Thinking | Presentation reflects thoughtfulness, insight, and analysis. Synthesizes recommendations. | Thought, insight, and analysis has taken place. | Restates summary of disorder. | Presentation is rudimentary and superficial. | 25 |
| Safety | Relevant safety concerns are fully addressed and explained. | Relevant safety concerns lack clarity or are generalized. | Safety concerns are incomplete. | Safety concerns are not addressed. | 25 |
| Communication | Ideas are arranged logically. Language clearly and effectively communicates ideas. Errors are minimal. Citations are present. Content is formatte so as to be useful for clinical practice. | Ideas are arranged logically. In general, language does not interfere with communication. Errors are not distracting or frequent, although may be present. Citations are present. | Transition between ideas is occasionally rough. Work is organized but communication is distracting due to typos, misspellings and other errors. Citations are present. | Work is unfocused and poorly organized. In many places language obscures meaning. Lacks logical connection of ideas. Little evidence of proofreading. Citations are omitted. | 25 |
| Total points | 100 | ||||