Current Regis Time
| Exemplary Exceeds Expectations |
Advanced Meets Expectations |
Intermediate Needs Improvement |
Novice Inadequate |
Total Points | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall plan | Plan is well formed, reasonable, feasible and adequately addresses the continuing education needs of a psychiatric APRN. 25 points |
Plan is somewhat organized but feasible. Would be reasonable to meet continuing education needs. 22 points |
Plan is not organized but somewhat feasible. Would not adequately address continuing education needs. 19 points |
Plan is not feasible or would not adequately address continuing education needs. 17 points |
25 |
| Quality of Content | Plan represents a good mix of resources that address immediate, point of care learning needs, that inform the clinician about emerging topics and that provide opportunities to develop further understanding of existing issues in psychopharmacology. 25 points |
Plan addresses some needs of the adult learner but does not adequately meet both short and long term learning needs. 22 points |
Plan addresses few needs of the adult learner. Does not adequately meet learning needs. 19 points |
Plan lacks resources for broad educational needs. 17 points |
25 |
| Critical Thinking | Analysis of resources is present and explanation of chosen resources supports the learning plan. 25 points |
Information is a summary. Explanation of resources does not adequately support plan. 22 points |
Information is brief. Plan not supported. 19 points |
Fails to explain how chosen resources support learning needs of the nurse. 17 points |
25 |
| Communication | Ideas are arranged logically. Language clearly and effectively communicates ideas. Errors are minimal. 25 points |
In general, language does not interfere with communication. Errors are not distracting or frequent, although may be present. Transition between ideas is occasionally rough. 22 points |
Work is unfocused and somewhat organized. Errors are distracting and little connection of ideas. Little evidence of proofreading. 19 points |
Work is unfocused and poorly organized. In many places language obscures meaning. Lacks logical connection of ideas. Little evidence of proofreading. 17 points |
25 |
| Total points | 100 | ||||