Criteria | Exemplary Exceeds Expectations |
Advanced Meets Expectations |
Intermediate Needs Improvement |
Novice Inadequate |
Total Points |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sampling Method, Sample, and Setting | Each component is clear, thorough, and detailed, and it includes: Recruitment and Sampling methodology (random, purposive, convenience, etc.) Sample inclusion and exclusion criteria Selection method of participants (random table of numbers, random number generator, coin flip, etc.) Sample Size and Rationale for sample size (power analysis or data saturation). Setting from which the sample is drawn 50 points |
Most of the components for recruitment, sampling methodology, sample and selection method, and setting are included and are mostly clear, somewhat thorough, but missing details (missing up to three important details of sample section components)
44 points |
Many of the components for recruitment, sampling methodology, sample and selection method, and setting are missing and are not clearly stated (missing between four to seven important details of sample section components)
39 points |
Most of the components for recruitment, sampling methodology, sample and selection method, and setting are missing (missing seven or more important details of sample section)
34 points |
50 |
Informed Consent and Ethical Considerations | Type of Institutional Review Board Review is specified: exempt, expedited, or full board review, and. justification is provided Provides a rationale for selecting the type of review Identifies specific ethical issues related to the research and how they are addressed Identifies how the participants are protected by de-identification, etc Data storage description and rationale Includes an informed consent as an appendix using the template provided on the Regis College IRB website (submitted in Week 7) 40 points |
Most of the components are included and are clearly stated (missing up to three important details of the informed consent and ethical considerations section)
35 points |
Many of the components are missing and are not clearly stated (missing up to four to seven important details of the informed consent and ethical considerations section)
31 points |
Most of the components are missing and not clearly stated (missing seven or more important details of the informed consent and ethical considerations section)
27 points |
40 |
APA Format and Writing Mechanics | Few to no APA and/or writing mechanic errors (five or less unique errors) 10 points |
Few to moderate APA and/or writing mechanic errors (6-10 unique errors) 8 points |
Moderate to many APA and/or writing mechanic errors (11-15 unique errors) 7 points |
Many APA errors or APA not followed. Many writing mechanic errors so that the assignment is very confusing and difficult to follow (more than 15 unique errors) 6 points |
10 |
Total Points | 100 |