Note: An appropriate scholarly resource for this assignment is a current (within five years) evidence-based practice article from a peer-reviewed journal. Review assignment instructions for any additional requirements such as number of annotations to include.
Criteria | Exemplary Exceeds Expectations |
Advanced Meets Expectations |
Intermediate Needs Improvement |
Novice Inadequate |
Total Points |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Identifies Relevant Sources Selected articles: |
Relate directly to the topic and report results of empirical research studies conducted by the authors. 15 points |
Relate directly to the topic and include two original research studies. 13 points |
May or may not relate directly to the topic and include only one original research study. 11 points |
Do not clearly relate to the topic and do not include original research. 10 points |
15 |
Annotation summarizes the article's
Purpose Point or argument Each annotation: |
Summarizes in the student’s own words—the purpose of the study, sample description, tool(s) used, significant findings, and point or argument that the author is trying to make. 20 points |
Summarizes in the student’s own words—the purpose of the article and point or argument that the author is trying to make. 17 points |
Summarizes the purpose of the article with reliance on quotations. 15 points |
Summarizes the article with reliance on quotations and without a clear identification of purpose. 13 points |
20 |
Annotation analyzes quality of each article's Author credentials and authority Level of writing Intended audience Legitimacy of content Limitations/ weaknesses Each annotation: |
Provides relevant detail to analyze each component of criteria. 20 points |
Analyzes each component of criteria but may miss relevant detail for one area. 17 points |
Misses relevant detail or two areas of identified criteria. 15 points |
Misses three or more areas of identified criteria. 13 points |
20 |
Annotation evaluates value of each article to Assignment objectives Course objectives Nursing in general Each annotation: |
Evaluates the usefulness or value of the article’s content by aligning significant findings or results to assignment and course objectives, and nursing in general. 25 points |
Evaluates the usefulness or value of the articles content to assignment and course objectives, and nursing in general. 22 points |
Misses one or two components of evaluation. 19 points |
Misses three or more components of evaluation. 17 points |
25 |
Organization: Concise Logical Each annotation: |
Evaluates each article in a concise, logical flow of ideas, and is without repetition. 10 points |
Evaluates two articles with a logical flow of ideas and is without repetition. 8 points |
Evaluates a single article with errors in flow of ideas. 7 points |
Evaluates a single article with errors in flow of ideas significantly distracting from content. 6 points |
10 |
APA Reference: Components Punctuation Capitalization Italics Spacing Each reference: |
Meets all format criteria. 5 points |
Has one consistent format error. 4 points |
Has two consistent format errors. 3 points |
Has more than two format errors. 2 points |
5 |
Grammar and Spelling Each annotation: |
Avoids awkward transitions, overuse of conjunctions, spelling, word-usage, or punctuation errors. 5 points |
Has less than two grammatical, word-usage, spelling, or punctuation errors. 4 points |
Has three or more grammatical, spelling, word-usage, or punctuation errors. 3 points |
Has grammatical, spelling, word-usage, and punctuation errors that significantly distract from content. 2 points |
5 |
Total Points | 100 |